T-T-S [T-T-S]
CEO: Tricia McManus Members10
FoundedJan 30, 2009 (17 years)
Tax Rate 0%
Combat
Kills6
Losses6
Efficiency50%
Danger Ratio100%
ISK
Destroyed19.20m
Lost393.28m
ISK Efficiency5%
Balance-374076561
Activity
Solo Kills3
Final Blows3
Combat Points6
Members10
Last 90 Days
Kills0
Losses0
ISK Destroyed0
ISK Lost0
Loading valuable kills…
Ship ClassesLoading…
Bio
Original name: Tricia's Informative Trade Trust Investigation and Exploration Services. (T.I.T.T.I.E.S.)
Mainly engaged in scouting and exploring "Primarily Unusable Space and Subspace Yard" (P.U.S.S.Y.) areas for mining and drilling operation, we furthermore devote much of our time to the prevention of "degenerated intravert clustered kamikaze suspects" (d.i.c.k.s.) from invading p.u.s.s.y. territory.
Although formerly conventional methods like 'Secondary Linear Antimatter Pulse Strikes' (S.L.A.P.S.) seemed sufficient to repel d.i.c.k.s. from P.U.S.S.Y., we have recently commenced the use of 'Passively Locking / Unlocking Guard Systems' (P.L.U.G.S.) with quite some success.
Also, employment of 'Battery Operated Barriers' (B.O.Bs) appears to yield a certain saturation effect on P.U.S.S.Y., and the latter seems to attract less d.i.c.k.s. when B.O.Bs are being used on it.
Clearly, the combined use of B.O.Bs, P.L.U.G.S. and S.L.A.P.S. for defending P.U.S.S.Y. is the future, but synergetic or adverse effects of this are completely unresearched and cannot be entirely predicted in advance.
Hence, our main research efforts currently involve d.i.c.k.s. reaction when encountering B.O.Bs, P.L.U.G.S. or S.L.A.P.S. separately, and/or simultaneously.
Recently, Professional Employment of Recurrent Immediate Obstructive Deposits (P.E.R.I.O.D.) has been suggested, for its almost 100% chance to repel D.I.C.K.S. of all flavors.
This may sound like a major breakthrough to the casual observer, but -contrary claims notwithstanding- PERIOD can not be employed willingly. This is a major downside to its use, even as a deceptive strategy: D.I.C.K. actually falling for a fake PERIOD (except in unfamiliar / uncharted territories) is currently unheard of.
(P.S.: we do not accept membership applications.
"You don't find us, we find you !")
.
Mainly engaged in scouting and exploring "Primarily Unusable Space and Subspace Yard" (P.U.S.S.Y.) areas for mining and drilling operation, we furthermore devote much of our time to the prevention of "degenerated intravert clustered kamikaze suspects" (d.i.c.k.s.) from invading p.u.s.s.y. territory.
Although formerly conventional methods like 'Secondary Linear Antimatter Pulse Strikes' (S.L.A.P.S.) seemed sufficient to repel d.i.c.k.s. from P.U.S.S.Y., we have recently commenced the use of 'Passively Locking / Unlocking Guard Systems' (P.L.U.G.S.) with quite some success.
Also, employment of 'Battery Operated Barriers' (B.O.Bs) appears to yield a certain saturation effect on P.U.S.S.Y., and the latter seems to attract less d.i.c.k.s. when B.O.Bs are being used on it.
Clearly, the combined use of B.O.Bs, P.L.U.G.S. and S.L.A.P.S. for defending P.U.S.S.Y. is the future, but synergetic or adverse effects of this are completely unresearched and cannot be entirely predicted in advance.
Hence, our main research efforts currently involve d.i.c.k.s. reaction when encountering B.O.Bs, P.L.U.G.S. or S.L.A.P.S. separately, and/or simultaneously.
Recently, Professional Employment of Recurrent Immediate Obstructive Deposits (P.E.R.I.O.D.) has been suggested, for its almost 100% chance to repel D.I.C.K.S. of all flavors.
This may sound like a major breakthrough to the casual observer, but -contrary claims notwithstanding- PERIOD can not be employed willingly. This is a major downside to its use, even as a deceptive strategy: D.I.C.K. actually falling for a fake PERIOD (except in unfamiliar / uncharted territories) is currently unheard of.
(P.S.: we do not accept membership applications.
"You don't find us, we find you !")
.
Loading active members…
Stats
No activity in the selected period