Joe Mantis

I often ask myself: do the masses perceive that even merely yearning for the dominion of those to whom deciding the outcome of an as yet to be agreed upon compact (by a particular individual who did surely not decide how to go about comparing the likeness between the role of oneself and/or their alter ego) to be explicitly of trivial contention? For instance, one diligently acquiring proportionally more than those of equal stature, should they be of the same esteem? Perhaps the circumstance could - or rather should - call for an inquiry into the criteria compiled jointly by those in seats of authority, more precisely to whom the notion raised portray the causative therein as a matter more suited to these persons of supposed prestige. When in fact these are not at all the champions of the people which pose said question, but are pantomiming charlatans. Rest assured their outward personas are presumed to be held in high regard by their "Superiors". But then again who among us are?
☂